Petr Fedin

• 01 Buying and assortment Multi-brand retail: buying budget, assortment matrix, demand forecast and allocation
  Details →
• 02 Product and production Premium segment: cost, specifications, order placement, supplier lead times
  Details →
• 03 Markets and finance Market and competitor assessment, financial model, funding requirement, investor materials
  Details →
• 04 Turnaround Liquidity, priorities, processes and roles, plan-versus-actual control, return to growth
  Details →
• 05 Business systems integration Management and analytics: data, roles, workflows, forecasting and budgeting
  Details →

About me Request CV

1. 01 Growth strategy and capital Market, category and growth-model choices with explicit risks. DecisionPrioritise growth investments. Details →
2. 02 Commercial model and sales Sales channels, pricing, customer economics and profitability. DecisionIdentify profitable sales channels. Details →
3. 03 Assortment, product and buying Collections, demand, buying and inventory. DecisionDecide what to buy and distribute. Details →
4. 04 Processes and digital systems Data, operating processes and the rollout of PLM, ERP, CRM or BI. DecisionMake workflow execution traceable. Details →
5. 05 Analytics: merchandise, capital and forecast Working capital, financial scenarios and resilience. DecisionControl inventory capital and forecast demand. Details →

1. 6 November 2026 Syntha

   In Syntha a collection can be shown to a new buyer through a link with no prices and an expiry date

   Showing a collection to someone who is not yet your partner usually means sending a file or opening access to a working account, while prices and terms have to stay inside. In the Syntha virtual showroom I built a guest link for this. For brands that show a collection to new buyers before a relationship begins. What changed: the brand creates a link with a password and a lifetime of up to 30 days, and can revoke it at any moment. The guest sees the layout of looks and their names, but not the price, minimum order, availability or SKUs. After sign-in the session lasts 30 minutes, and entry is blocked after five failed attempts. The token and password are stored only as hashes. For a buyer from the brand's catalogue, hotspots can be placed on a look: tap an item and a quick view opens, with the price taken from that buyer's own catalogue. Separately, two leaks found during an isolation review are closed: planned unit cost in the assortment is no longer visible to roles without the right, and someone else's object now answers as if it did not exist (404 instead of 403), so it cannot be found by guessing numbers. What it gives you: • A collection can be shown to a new person without revealing prices, order sizes or stock. • Access ends by itself or on your command: the link does not live forever. • Roles without the right to see cost will not see it, and an outsider cannot tell whether another party's order exists. Limits: a QR code for the link is not built yet; the features are described from the code changes and automated tests, and have not been tried in a live scenario with a brand. Stage: preparing for a pilot. Next — the QR code and a live walkthrough with the first brand.

   Synthashowroomproduct
   Details →
2. 6 November 2026 Market

   Zalando: gross margin −0.9 pts to 38.7%, but inventory at 18.4% of sales versus 21.8%

   Reuters

   Zalando paid for clearing its warehouse with margin: sneaker discounts cost 0.9 points of gross margin, while inventory relative to sales fell by 3.4 points. The question is whether that price paid off. What the piece covers: Reuters reports on 3 November that Zalando's third-quarter revenue rose 5.1% to €3.17 billion against the €3.15 billion analysts expected, and gross merchandise value rose 7.5% to €4.54 billion. Gross margin fell 0.9 points to 38.7% and missed expectations; Investing.com puts the consensus at 39.9%. Finance chief Anna Dimitrova put it down to "targeted investments in attractive offers", especially in sneakers, called the pressure temporary and expects a broadly flat gross margin for 2026. According to Investing.com, B2C revenue rose 2.8% to €2.83 billion and B2B rose 27.9% to €354 million, and the faster B2B growth also weighs on margin. EBIT rose 10.6% to €106.5 million (a 3.4% margin), helped by a 90-basis-point reduction in fulfilment costs. The net result was a loss of €18 million against a profit of €12.5 million a year earlier; these sources do not give the reasons. Jefferies analysts noted that clearing sneakers helped hold inventory at 18.4% of trailing-12-month sales versus 21.8% a year earlier. The 2026 EBIT guidance was kept at €680–720 million. Separately, Zalando unveiled its first AI agent, which will let customers buy other retailers' products in its app; AI-assisted checkout on the Zalando Extended platform is promised for 2027. Analysis: This is margin traded for turnover, and it shows in the numbers: gross margin minus 0.9 points, inventory minus 3.4 points of sales, EBIT margin roughly plus 0.2 points (€106.5 million against €96.3 million on revenue of about €3.17 and €3.02 billion, my own calculation from the figures given). The EBIT gain came not from the discounts themselves but from logistics: the drop in fulfilment costs almost equals the lost gross margin (the source does not say what the 90 basis points are measured against; I read them as a share of revenue). So the discount paid back not directly but through a freed-up warehouse and cheaper order handling. Second, a net loss alongside rising EBIT shows that results cannot be judged on one number; the piece does not name the reasons for the loss, so I draw no conclusions about them. Third, B2B is growing almost ten times faster than B2C (27.9% against 2.8%) and structurally lowers gross margin, so the "temporary" pressure the finance chief describes depends on channel mix, not only on discounts. Limits: this is one quarter of one platform, and the data comes without a category breakdown; applying it to Russian retail is my hypothesis, not a result of these figures. Conclusions: • Judge a discount campaign by three numbers at once: gross margin, inventory as a share of sales, and the cost of handling an order; margin alone does not explain it. • Before clearing a category, calculate how much working capital it frees and compare it with the margin lost: Zalando swapped 0.9 points of margin for 3.4 points of inventory. • Watch the channel mix: a fast-growing low-margin channel lowers overall margin even without discounts. • Do not call margin pressure temporary until you can name what will change next quarter.

   analysismargininventory
   Details →
3. 3 November 2026 Market

   Hugo Boss: gross margin +2.2 pts to 63.3%, but gross profit in euros is lower and EBIT guidance is cut to €250–300 million

   FashionUnited

   Hugo Boss won on the margin of every item but lost on volume: in euros, gross profit for the quarter actually fell. What the piece covers: FashionUnited reports on 3 November that Hugo Boss third-quarter revenue fell 4% to €946 million (from €989 million) and 5% at constant currency. Gross margin rose 220 basis points to 63.3% thanks to sourcing efficiencies and optimised pricing. Operating expenses rose 2%: higher administration costs outweighed savings in selling and marketing. EBIT was €81 million against €95 million, a margin of 8.6% against 9.6%. The 2026 guidance was cut: constant-currency sales are now expected to fall by a high single-digit percentage (previously mid to high single digit), and EBIT is €250–300 million (previously €300–350 million). The reasons are softer fourth-quarter demand and higher non-cash amortisation of IT assets. Trade net working capital is now about 21% of sales instead of 20%: revised supplier payment terms reduced trade payables. Capital expenditure is 4–5% of sales (previously about 4%) because of the purchase of a previously leased logistics property at headquarters. Revenue, EBIT and the new guidance are also confirmed by a Hargreaves Lansdown item of 3 November; these sources contain no brand or regional split and no inventory data. Analysis: Put the numbers side by side (my own calculation from rounded figures). Last year's gross margin was about 61.1%, so gross profit was about €604 million, and now it is about €599 million: the 2.2-point gain did not cover the loss of €43 million of revenue. EBIT fell by €14 million, of which about €5.5 million comes from gross profit and the rest from costs. Sourcing and pricing, which the brand controls itself, worked; demand does not obey it, and fixed costs do not depend on revenue. Second, working capital. When suppliers are paid earlier, trade payables shrink and the need for cash rises by a point of sales; this cost is invisible in the margin. Third, part of the EBIT decline is accounting (IT amortisation) and buying cannot fix it. Limits: the sources contain no inventory or brand split, so the reasons for the sales decline within the assortment are not visible; applying this to Russian retail is my reasoning, not a result of these figures. Conclusions: • Judge results by gross profit in money, not by margin alone: +2.2 points on −4% revenue produced a loss. • Look at margin after operating costs: it shows what is left in practice. • Treat supplier payment terms as part of buying strategy: they move working capital by points of sales. • Separate operational from accounting causes of lower profit: the first can be changed by buying and pricing, the second cannot.

   analysismarginguidance
   Details →